Closed jan-ivar closed 1 year ago
Based on https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/pull/186#issuecomment-531421759 and as described in slide. Also fixed up isolation properties to be per track.
Promise to add a promise
Promise me no promises?
@jan-ivar @henbos Reviewing the TPAC minutes could not locate mention of replaceStream()
or replaceTrack()
. Were the PRs in this repository for the proposals brought up and discussed formally or informally? If so, what were the conclusion reached?
It was discussed here. I felt there was support for progress, though no final consensus as I recall.
@jan-ivar What does that ultimately mean as a practical matter?
@Pehrsons PTAL. The concern raised at TPAC was replacing multiple tracks in concert, and whether returning a promise might simplify knowing when it is safe to stop all replaced tracks.
Here's my attempt. Note that MediaRecorder is a different beast from e.g. RTCPeerConnection when it comes to state. Changes are often synchronously observable, and asynchronous operations are not serialized (no operations chain).
any update on this MR ?
Seems to have no developer interest in implementation, so closing because of lack of interest.
Alternative fix for https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/issues/167.
Preview | Diff