Open r12a opened 5 years ago
Could you describe the use case for this?
Are we talking about a user preference for the width of the NNBSP in any text, or is this related to maximum stretch widths in justification or letter-spacing?
(I read that as a fixed vs. adjustable width setting for U+202F; I didn't see any indication that a particular amount of stretch was proposed. Adjustable width, if enabled, would presumably be caused by justificaiton, etc.)
This is about justification.
This is part of the efforts to allow the ill-defined NNBSP to behave actually like an ordinary U+0020 SP character (which is the preferred behavior for many users). As the width is already controllable in fonts (fonts can make NNBSP as wide as SP), the authors are saying there’s got to be some way to allow NNBSP, which is usually not stretchable, to be stretchable for justification.
This is an issue originally raised by Nasun-urt and Huqitu in the mlreq draft. Moving the issue here for discussion and elaboration before contacting the CSS WG.