w3c / odrl

ODRL Community Group Repository
https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/
Other
18 stars 9 forks source link

REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 #4

Closed riannella closed 5 years ago

riannella commented 5 years ago

The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification, "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", is beyond First Public Working Draft but not yet ready for Candidate Recommendation.

Since you were the group that did the Permissions and Obligations Expressions work, we would like to ask for any early comments you might have on our admittedly incomplete specification, in an attempt to address any major issues earlier rather than later.

Would your group (or some members of your group) be willing to give the document an informal read-through? We are looking for comments within approximately a 60-day timeframe if possible.

The best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [1] as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [2] work as well. Comments on either the (stable) dated draft [3] or the live Editor's Draft [4] are fine, whichever is easiest for you.

If you need anything else from us first, please don't hesitate to contact the chairs directly.

Thank you,

Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group

CC: Specification editors

[1] GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model [2] Mailing list: public-vc-comments@w3.org [3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft: https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/ [4] Tip of tree editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/

riannella commented 5 years ago

See this specific section: https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/#terms-of-use

riannella commented 5 years ago

In Example 11, the assigner should be a URI. Something like https://dmv.example.gov/verifiers/all

Perhaps they can also state that https://dmv.example.gov/verifiers/all is a PartyCollection.

They can also use "archive" as the action (from the ODRL common vocab)

The type can be a "Set" (as this is the default Policy type).

They should update the narrative to read:

In the example above, the issuer (assigner) is prohibiting all verifiers (assignee) from storing the data in an archive.

riannella commented 5 years ago

Example 12:

The narrative should be updated to read:

In the example above, the holder (the assigner) is prohibiting a verifier (the assignee) from using the information provided to correlate the (target) credentials using a 3rd party service

riannella commented 5 years ago

Added to the VC WG GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/234