Closed marcoscaceres closed 5 years ago
Redid the test and updated MDN.
How far in the future are we thinking about the active instrument check?
I’m unsure - that was really unclear to me. Do we want it now? Can we live without it for V1?
I would prefer to implement it soon, but don't want to force the other implementers or block the CR process.
I guess we could at least draft it up and put everything in place, then check implementation plans.
Good idea :+1:
We couldn’t implement in Firefox for at least 3 month. We have a big backlog to finish just with the current stuff. That means 6 months till we would have something in release.
Unrelated but, Mozilla folks put together this great wiki page that shows our implementation priorities, with explanations, and stuff we still need to do (@ianbjacobs and Chairs, you might like it):
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Features/Web_Payments/DOM
It gives a good sense of where we are at and updates dynamically as we fix things, so good to periodically check.
During the F2F, we came to a consensus that "canMakePayment" means "the user agent supports the PMIs" - but it does not mean that there is a payment instrument set up. We concluded that we might add something to check if there is an active instrument in the future.
closes #800
The following tasks have been completed:
Implementation commitment:
Optional, Impact on Payment Handler spec?
@ianbjacobs and @rsolomakhin, probably some impact! ☄️