Closed marcoscaceres closed 2 years ago
This should just point to the definition in HTML spec. That definition needs to be fixed but the PointerLock spec shouldn't worry about the details.
Right, so, I guess the question is, does it use transient or sticky activation? and will it consume the activation?
Yes, this needs to be clarified. The "engagement gesture" idea essentially makes requestPointerLock()
a Transient activation-gated API. I will work on a PR next week.
This was fixed through https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/76.
Link to "activation triggering input event" is broken. Not sure what it should link to.