remove "COO" from a list in an informal Note. "COO" is not defined in the document either (in contrast, CEO is in the glossary), so this seems like it was a mistake that made it past review, and thus should be removed from a non-normative Note. if there's an actual use-case for adding "COO" to the Process, that should be raised as a separate issue for proper definition and consideration.
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed remove mention of COO.
The full IRC log of that discussion
<fantasai> Subtopic: remove mention of COO
<fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/614
<plh> fantasai: Tantek suggesting removing the COO from a Note
<plh> florian: Ralph is the COO, but the Process doesn't define anything related to the COO. So, unnecessary.
<plh> plh: +1
<cwilso> +1
<fantasai> plh: if CEO wants to delegate to COO can always do so
<plh> Resolved: merge #614
remove "COO" from a list in an informal Note. "COO" is not defined in the document either (in contrast, CEO is in the glossary), so this seems like it was a mistake that made it past review, and thus should be removed from a non-normative Note. if there's an actual use-case for adding "COO" to the Process, that should be raised as a separate issue for proper definition and consideration.
Preview | Diff