search

w3c / process

W3C Process Document
https://www.w3.org/policies/process/drafts/
196 stars 130 forks source link

Clarify expectations about FO mitigations #659

Closed frivoal closed 2 years ago

frivoal commented 2 years ago

Here are some suggested improvements to the handling of mitigations of overturned decisions, based on discussions of #645 during the process CG call of October 13th.

Preview | Diff

css-meeting-bot commented 2 years ago

The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Clarify expectations about FO mitigations.

The full IRC log of that discussion <fantasai> Subtopic: Clarify expectations about FO mitigations
<fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/659
css-meeting-bot commented 2 years ago

The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Clarify expectations about FO mitigations, and agreed to the following:

The full IRC log of that discussion <fantasai> subtopic: Clarify expectations about FO mitigations
<fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/659
<fantasai> florian: Last time we did accept PR as part of DF about FO mitigations
<fantasai> ... we were happy with the substance of it, but during discussion noted some editorial improvements
<fantasai> ... I tried to make them
<fantasai> ... for the ppl who reviewed this, have not found problems with this PR
<fantasai> ... but while reviewing this, it made Nigel notice that something else wasn't clear
<fantasai> ... so might have some text from last year that needs improvement
<fantasai> ... so I think that needs follow-up, but this PR does the job of clarifying things correctly
<fantasai> plh: anyone need more time?
<fantasai> <fantasai> +1 to merging
<fantasai> RESOLVED: Merge 659
<fantasai> ACTION: florian to open up separate issue for Nigel's comments