Closed frivoal closed 2 months ago
Data would certainly be helpful here. This is ringing tiny bells for me that we may once have either used it or relied on the possibility of using it, in order to make a decision.
I think what's happened is that the standard process has been streamlined enough that we don't need to implement this additional system. :) So +1 to removing it.
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed Retire "Streamlined Publication Approval"
, and agreed to the following:
RESOLVED: Accept PR 857 to delete "Streamlined Publication Approval"
I believe that Streamlined Publication Approval is unused.
The motivation for this Process feature is described at the begining of the section:
In practice, nobody has found it useful to place the additional burden on themselves to document that all additional criteria are fulfilled in order to save a little bit of time by spiking verification of the update request, nor requested improved tooling to make that easier. (@plh, could you confirm?)
We should admit that this is a failed experiment, and remove it from the Process. Rules about REC track transitions are complicated enough without confusing people with irrelevant clauses.