Closed jccr closed 4 years ago
Sidestepping "that" issue, I have a different concern with the use of "form". The form is not open to interpretation, only the specific variable type you use to represent it (hash, associative array, object, etc.).
The note might be better rewritten along the lines of:
"User agents can process and internalize the resulting structure using any language that can represent the final form of the data."
The language of the note in C.3 sounds funny to me:
How about this instead?