w3c / raur

http://w3c.github.io/raur/
Other
0 stars 2 forks source link

§5.3 Bandwidth for video - confusing title [RAUR] #5

Open gunnarhm opened 3 years ago

gunnarhm commented 3 years ago

§5.3 Bandwidth for video" has partly the same wording as was in §5.2 about audio. That part is proposed to be deleted from §5.3

Change title to §5.3 Quality requirements on video, because bandwidth itself is not possible to experience as a quality factor. Instead the HD requirement is good. A reference can also be made to the requirements and note in §5.1, because the requirements are the same for sign language and lip reading because perceiving lip movements is included in sign language perception.

RealJoshue108 commented 3 years ago

@gunnarhm agreed. Changed in branch.

Regarding your comment:

A reference can also be made to the requirements and note in §5.1, because the requirements are the same for sign language and lip reading because perceiving lip movements is included in sign language perception.

Please suggest some text.

gunnarhm commented 3 years ago

Add a note: NOTE: A hard of hearing user often combines perception of speech from audio with perception of lip movements and other visual clues to a combined impression for understanding of speech. For the visual parts, the requirements on video are the same as expressed in §5.1 about perception of sign language because lip movements are also part of sign language and equally rapid and detailed as other parts of sign language.


Also in the main text of §5.3 change "frames per minute" to "frames per second" because that is a more often used measure.

gunnarhm commented 3 years ago

Den 2021-04-14 kl. 16:32, skrev RealJoshue108:

@gunnarhm https://github.com/gunnarhm agreed. Changed in branch.

Regarding your comment:

"A reference can also be made to the requirements and note in §5.1, because the requirements are the same for sign language and lip reading because perceiving lip movements is included in sign language perception. "

Please suggest some text.

I have answered with this comment in GitHub:

Add a note: NOTE: A hard of hearing user often combines perception of speech from audio with perception of lip movements and other visual clues to a combined impression for understanding of speech. For the visual parts, the requirements on video are the same as expressed in §5.1 about perception of sign language because lip movements are also part of sign language and equally rapid and detailed as other parts of sign language.


Also in the main text of §5.3 change "frames per minute" to "frames per second" because that is a more often used measure.


Regards

Gunnar

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <w3c/raur#5>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEBY5AZLHVDMCQCSJUXZHLTIWRPPANCNFSM42JPBZ5Q.

-- Gunnar Hellström GHAccess @.***

RealJoshue108 commented 3 years ago

Added to branch https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/gunnarhm-edits-to-RAUR/raur/index.html

RealJoshue108 commented 3 years ago

@gunnarhm I made some small editorial edits to your suggested text:

"A hard of hearing user often combines their perception of speech from audio with their perception of lip movement and other visual clues to create an overall understanding of speech. For the visual parts, the requirements on video are the same as expressed in '5.1 Deaf users: Video resolution and frame rates' about perception of sign language because lip movements are also part of sign language, equally rapid and as detailed as the other parts of sign language."

Does this read better to you?

gunnarhm commented 3 years ago

@gunnarhm I made some small editorial edits to your suggested text:

"A hard of hearing user often combines their perception of speech from audio with their perception of lip movement and other visual clues to create an overall understanding of speech. For the visual parts, the requirements on video are the same as expressed in '5.1 Deaf users: Video resolution and frame rates' about perception of sign language because lip movements are also part of sign language, equally rapid and as detailed as the other parts of sign language."

Does this read better to you?

Yes, that is fine.

RealJoshue108 commented 3 years ago

Thanks @gunnarhm