The main change is the reference to Rachel's and Dave's paper.
I have updated the reference to the one archived via the mailing list
I have changed §1.1 by
Added a reference to the review which we still miss (should be filled), but also a reference to the implementation and deployment (please, @msporny and @dlongley, check this!)
I have, to be symmetric, added a reference to Aidan's entry making it clear that he author has implemented the algorithm. @aidhog, any other way you prefer to have that?
I think having a reference to both to some review (because it is mathematics) and to implementation (because this should become a standard after all...) is important.
I have, to be symmetric, added a reference to Aidan's entry making it clear that he author has implemented the algorithm. @aidhog, any other way you prefer to have that?
The main change is the reference to Rachel's and Dave's paper.
I think having a reference to both to some review (because it is mathematics) and to implementation (because this should become a standard after all...) is important.