search

w3c / rch-wg-charter

Charter proposal for an “RDF Dataset Canonicalization and Hash Working Group”
https://w3c.github.io/rch-wg-charter/
Other
12 stars 7 forks source link

Add roadmap to explainer. #19

Closed msporny closed 3 years ago

iherman commented 3 years ago

I would prefer to leave this open for now, and see the first feedbacks from the community.

msporny commented 3 years ago

I would prefer to leave this open for now, and see the first feedbacks from the community.

Works for me.

msporny commented 3 years ago

Interested in input from @philarcher, @danbri, @gkellogg, @philarcher, and @peacekeeper -- should we merge this PR, or just close it. I'm fine w/ either... but it's been hanging out there for a while and we should process it since we're wrapping up the pre-charter review.

philarcher commented 3 years ago

I think I'd rather leave it out, only because it has the potential to cause a political explosion. I dare to hope that we are zeroing in on an acceptable version of the charter and explainer, this might throw that off course, helpful though it is.

danbri commented 3 years ago

It's not so much a roadmap as some potentially related work links. Adding them as related seems fine, adding them as 'roadmap' risks misinterpretation by readers in the future.

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 15:30, Manu Sporny @.***> wrote:

Interested in input from @philarcher https://github.com/philarcher, @danbri https://github.com/danbri, @gkellogg https://github.com/gkellogg, @philarcher https://github.com/philarcher, and @peacekeeper https://github.com/peacekeeper -- should we merge this PR, or just close it. I'm fine w/ either... but it's been hanging out there for a while and we should process it since we're wrapping up the pre-charter review.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/pull/19#issuecomment-844161475, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABJSGJK7NGAAZXYYH6PDP3TOPDQFANCNFSM42BDIUOQ .

pchampin commented 3 years ago

+1 to what @philarcher wrote.

the fact that JSON-LD / CBOR-LD at the start of the timeline might give the impression that this work is syntax-dependant and kill our efforts to explain that it is not.

also, a minor detail: the diagram is not up-to-date w.r.t. the deliverables listed in the charter.

iherman commented 3 years ago

I would vote to close it.

gkellogg commented 3 years ago

I agree to leaving it out. While it might be useful, it has a greater potential to cause confusion and uncertainty.

msporny commented 3 years ago

Ok, works for me, closing.