Closed iherman closed 3 years ago
@samuelweiler, we would certainly need your comment and, hopefully, approval; these are changes have been initiated by your (justified!) comments...
I'm reasonably sure we'll make it a section within the integrity spec but that's a decision for later.
Actually, I was thinking about merging this with the canonicalization document :-)
Some bikeshedding for the future!
@samuelweiler I'd prefer to merge this PR but keep the original issues open, waiting for you further comments. It makes other, parallel charter discussion less complicated...
Fine with me.
This PR implements the proposal in https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/47#issuecomment-825749246 for a new division of the deliverables. I used the terms “Linked Data Hash” and “Linked Data Integrity” to name the two new documents, following the proposal of @OR13 and @gkellogg, respectively.
I hope the new description of the two new deliverables (replacing the old one), reflects the thoughts of @dlongley and @msporny.
Beyond those changes (and some other editorial changes) I have also adopted the proposal in https://github.com/w3c/lds-wg-charter/issues/46#issuecomment-823945189 on registries. The relationship of the Linked Data Vocabulary (normative) and Linked Data Registry (non-normative) deliverables is indeed not 100% clear, also in view of the process changes, so better treat these two issues together. In so doing I have added a reference to the possible new process; as the charter proposal will undergo W3M review, eventually, that review will tell us whether keeping this in the charter text is appropriate or not (or propose an alternative formulation).
CC: @gkellogg @dlongley
Preview | Diff