search

w3c / rdf-dir-literal

Proposal to add base direction to RDF Literals
Other
8 stars 6 forks source link

Added compound literals #23

Closed iherman closed 5 years ago

iherman commented 5 years ago

I picked up #22 and added to the document as yet another, possible solution; thanks to @afs

@afs can you look at this to see if it makes sense?

Preview | Diff

afs commented 5 years ago

Looks good! Thanks @iherman

iherman commented 5 years ago

I am fine moving it to the RDF section. I would appreciate you do it:-)

pchampin commented 5 years ago

I would appreciate you do it:-)

Done. Please have a look at the revise "General comments: Pros and cons" at the end of section 2.1 . I had to modify it slightly to account for the new RDF-based solution.

iherman commented 5 years ago

I changed only one thing: by adding this solution to the lot, it may not be necessarily the case that a new WG is required to do this. Defining 3-4 extra terms may be done in another structure; e.g., I could imagine the I18N WG defining, formally, those terms. (Or may be even not requiring a WG but only a CG; to be discussed.)

I have somewhat weakened the last sentence, and I will now merge it. Discussions with this group to follow...