w3c / rdf-semantics

https://w3c.github.io/rdf-semantics/
Other
5 stars 2 forks source link

normative references #12

Closed pfps closed 1 year ago

pfps commented 1 year ago

There are normative references to documents, e.g. RIF, whose content does not appear to be normative for RDF semantics. The following references should be informative

[ISO24707] 
    Information technology — Common Logic (CL) — A framework for a family of logic-based languages. ISO/EIC. 2018-07. Published. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/66249.html 
[OWL2-OVERVIEW] 
    OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition). W3C OWL Working Group. W3C. 11 December 2012. W3C Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ 
[OWL2-SYNTAX]
    OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax (Second Edition). Boris Motik; Peter Patel-Schneider; Bijan Parsia. W3C. 11 December 2012. W3C Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/ 
[RDF-TESTCASES]
    RDF Test Cases. jan grant; Dave Beckett. W3C. 10 February 2004. W3C Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/ 
[RIF-OVERVIEW]
    RIF Overview (Second Edition). Michael Kifer; Harold Boley. W3C. 5 February 2013. W3C Working Group Note. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview/ 
[SPARQL12-QUERY]
    SPARQL 1.2 Query Language. Steven Harris; Andy Seaborne. W3C. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://w3c.github.io/sparql-query/spec/ 

The citation of XML10 should be changed to XML11 and the entry for XML10 should be removed.

The entry for RDF Schema should be updated to 1.2.