Closed pfps closed 1 year ago
... is currently [RDF11-MT-20140225]
Shouldn't it be [RDF11-MT]?
Yes, it probably should be RDF11-MT. I don't recall why I put in the dated form.
RDF11-MT
In other specs, the dated form was used explicitly, but also probably for no particularly good reason.
... is currently [RDF11-MT-20140225]
Shouldn't it be [RDF11-MT]?