set timeline to 24 months, as resolved for #25

[pchampin]

arbitrary choices I made:

• planned 12 months for RDF specs that are quite ready (abstract and concrete syntaxes)
• planned 18 months for RDF specs that still need some work (semantics, vocabulary)
• planned 18 months for SPARQL specs that are quite ready (but they depend on RDF, and are usually longer)
• planned 24 months for other SPARQL specs

I didn't find any place to mention "we will recharter if we need more time", and anyway, this goes more or less without saying...

---

Preview | Diff

[pchampin]

I think those times seem feasible. Adding a paragraph to the effect that "publications from other working groups directly relating to RDF may be considered if time permits" could at least give the sense that the group could engage in more work, but rechartering may be necessary to find the time.

I think this is already addressed by the following:

For example, community efforts to integrate RDF-star into other RDF-related specifications might reach a maturity level justifying their adoption by this Working Group. Should this happen, a rechartering will be requested, involving a new review by the Advisory Committee.