search

w3c / rdf-star

RDF-star specification
https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/
Other
119 stars 23 forks source link

Issues running EARL report generator #153

Closed afs closed 3 years ago

afs commented 3 years ago

Capturing points discovered while preparing a EARL PR:

  1. The instructions say /releases but other reports are in /reports. But /reports is also the directory for the HTML production.
  2. They are not linked to on the home page.
  3. There are lot of stray red "X" on the reports. (these go away when there is more than one system in a section)
  4. doap:developer may be a blank node.
pchampin commented 3 years ago

the red "X"s indicate that we don't have two implementations passing that test (which is the success criterion on most RECs). In our case, we can probably disable this feature...

gkellogg commented 3 years ago

Capturing points discovered while preparing a EARL PR:

  1. The instructions say /releases but other reports are in /reports. But /reports is also the directory for the HTML production.

/reports is correct.

  1. They are not linked to on the home page.

they should be, but more importantly, they’re linked from the spec.

  1. There are lot of stray red "X" on the reports. (these go away when there is more than one system in a section)

what PA said.

  1. doap:developer may be a blank node.

That should be okay.

pchampin commented 3 years ago

@afs can we close this issue, or is there still a problem?

afs commented 3 years ago

It's not a problem any longer.

The red 'X's were my misunderstanding. The other points have been addressed.

gkellogg commented 3 years ago

The red 'X's are implemented in the Haml template, as it was useful for WGs to know when there a feature is considered widely implemented. That doesn't apply for CGs, so we could easily update the template to not show the 'X's.

afs commented 3 years ago

Now I understand their purpose, I'm fine with the status quo - I has assumed they marked an error in processing.