w3c / rdf-star

RDF-star specification
https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/
Other
120 stars 23 forks source link

Classes for RDF-star terminology #204

Closed afs closed 3 years ago

afs commented 3 years ago

Some initial material taken from #169 from @pchampin.


Preview | Diff

hartig commented 3 years ago

Good! A few comments/questions:

Given that these IRIs are in an RDF-star related "namespace", shouldn't rdf-star:Triple be the class of all RDF-star triples rather than RDF triples? Similarly for rdf-star:Graph.

Regarding rdf-star:Source I am not sure. Is "RDF source" a concept that is actually defined anywhere?

afs commented 3 years ago

This comes from material in https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/169#issuecomment-842078440 with a tiny data and HTML bit of formatting. With these large issues, discussions can skip over the small (and uncontroversial?!) parts.

RDF Source is from RDF 1.1 Concepts as informal terminology but becomes significant in discussion #169. There is a similar situation is SPARQL Update where a graph store is a collection of slots and the contents of the slot can be changed.

Yes - it is RDF-star triples and RDF-star graphs. It is in the namespace "rdf-star" so I think we can use a shorter form ":Graph" as a convenience but we should "RDF-star triples" in the rdfs:label and rdfs:comment which I've now changed.

hartig commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the changes in the labels and comments. That's what I was after ;-)

Thanks also for the reference regarding RDF source. I wasn't aware of that one.

rat10 commented 3 years ago

@afs You skipped some of the terms proposed by Pierre-Antoine in #169 and you completely ignored my comments. Would you please explain the rationale for the terms you defined, what their use case is? Also the explaining comments are so terse that they seem quite useless to me.

pchampin commented 3 years ago

This was discussed during today's call: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-09-17.html#t03 Resolved to merge.