Open pchampin opened 2 years ago
Good catch! I am fine with the proposed fix.
Probably best to fix the xsd;integer
typo above, making it xsd:integer
, in the "More precisely" discussion.
Probably best to fix the
xsd;integer
typo above, making itxsd:integer
, in the "More precisely" discussion.
done, thanks
+1 to the proposed fix.
... and we obviously do not want this!
What is the problem?
More precisely:
entails
under simple entailment, but does not entail that anymore under D-entailment recognizing
xsd:integer
.How to fix it?
An easy fix would be to change step 2.4 of the unstar mapping, more precisely:
would simply become
It means that ill-formed literals in quoted triples would now make the whole graph inconsistent -- which the current semantics aimed to avoid, but clearly that was not such a good idea...