Closed exaexa closed 7 months ago
PS I just received an automated mail about "As part of this policy, W3C groups must be able to assess the IPR context of contributions made to their repositories."
Thus I explicitly confirm that this contribution is editorial and non-normative, and thus (as the mail says) there's hopefully nothing to do.
I can't determine if there's anything to be done with respect to contributed code licensing here (the repo license doesn't say much), but just to be sure, I hereby waive all copyright claims for the grand total of 14 letters added in this PR. :]
Thanks. Without the scheme it is not a valid IRI.
O nice, thanks all!
This follows a bit of search and a stackoverflow question&answer here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35501103/are-email-addresses-without-mailto-allowed-as-iris
Even if the example is valid without the protocol prefixes, I believe the reason why it is indeed valid should be explained or referred to, in order to prevent confusion. If that's the case please let me know.
Thanks!
:boom: Error: 502 Bad Gateway :boom:
PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Feb 4, 2024, 8:06 PM UTC).
More
PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one: :rotating_light: [Spec Generator](https://www.w3.org/2015/labs/) - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec. :link: [Related URL]([object Object]) ``` error code: 502 ``` _If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please [file an issue](https://github.com/tobie/pr-preview/issues/new?title=Error%20not%20surfaced%20properly&body=See%20w3c/rdf-turtle%2353.)._