How about thorough/partial rather than general/para

w3c / ruby-t2s-req

Text to Speech of Electronic Documents Containing Ruby: User Requirements

https://w3c.github.io/ruby-t2s-req/

Other

0 stars 4 forks source link

How about thorough/partial rather than general/para #31

Closed murata2makoto closed 1 year ago

murata2makoto commented 2 years ago

JLreq uses "general-ruby" when every CJK ideographic characters have ruby annotations. But I prefer "thorough ruby". Likewise, JLreq uses "para-ruby" when some CJK ideographic characters have ruby while others do not. But I prefer "partial ruby". How do they sound to native speakers?

The term "thorough annotation" is used often. For example, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15153621/

murata2makoto commented 1 year ago

See English ruby terminology.

The latest draft uses 'fully-annotated ruby' and 'partially-annotated ruby'.