search

w3c / ruby-t2s-req

Text to Speech of Electronic Documents Containing Ruby: User Requirements
https://w3c.github.io/ruby-t2s-req/
Other
0 stars 4 forks source link

Issue 51 terminology #52

Open murata2makoto opened 1 month ago

murata2makoto commented 1 month ago

This is to address #51 .

Preview | Diff

netlify[bot] commented 1 month ago

Deploy Preview for ruby-t2s-req ready!

Name Link
Latest commit d877b2ced35d9727f60ce1d8ba944b3848d37ada
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/ruby-t2s-req/deploys/664be4604d087800082195d6
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-52--ruby-t2s-req.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

kidayasuo commented 1 month ago

I am a bit concerned that there are parts where the author’s opinions appear to be overly reflected in the writing. One example I noticed is the section about jukugo-ruby. I believe it should simply mention the benefits of each method, right?

A single ruby element or multiple ruby elements per one compound word

murata2makoto commented 1 month ago

I am a bit concerned that there are parts where the author’s opinions appear to be overly reflected in the writing.

I would like to merge this pull request first and then address such parts later. Please create separate issues for each of such parts.

One example I noticed is the section about jukugo-ruby. I believe it should simply mention the benefits of each method, right?

This is actually based on Okayama-san's and Florian's opinions. But I vaguely remember that one guy involved in JP DAISY textbooks has a different opinion. Don't know benefits of the approach of two <ruby> elements though.

murata2makoto commented 2 days ago

I know that a group of JP DAISY experts create multiple ruby elements per one compound word (one for each CJK character). But do other people do so? I have no supporting evidence.

murata2makoto commented 23 hours ago

I find a good reason from the email archive of the JP DAISY Consortium. How about this?

However, there is a good reason to attach ruby annotations to some, but not all, characters in a compound word. For example, consider 佳人, where 佳 is taught in junior high schools while 人 is taught in the first grade of elementary schools. Thus, it is natural to attach a ruby annotation to 佳 only. Thus, <ruby><rb><span lang="ja">佳</span></rb><rt>か</rt></ruby>人 is commonly used.