Open maximelefrancois86 opened 11 months ago
alternatively, we could extend the domain of sosa:hasFeatureOfInterest
so that it contains sosa:Sensor
, sosa:Actuator
, sosa:Deployment
, etc.
OK - you are proposing that SSN should support the description of the Sensor
/Actuator
/Sampler
(and maybe the Procedures
as well?).
It could apply to both Feature-types and individuals.
I agree that this looks like a logical extension of the ontology. However, W3C requires evidence-of-implementation. Do you have this through SAREF (for example)?
When the "generic property" modeling choice is adopted (i.e., properties are generic to any feature of interest), then SOSA/SSN does not cover the following competency questions:
Proposal: introduce properties like
sosa:observesFeature
,sosa:actsOnFeature
,sosa:forFeature