Open dr-shorthair opened 3 months ago
Are the @
in the hasSimpleResult
attributes correct in ssn/examples/2024ex-uomtype.jsonld?
"hasSimpleResult": {
"@type": "http://qudt.org/vocab/unit/DEG_C",
"@value": "19.9"
}
The thing that bothers me about this example is that the number is encoded as a String. Which means the reader can't be sure the writer used decimal point or comma... Is there a way around this?
In SOSA we only have phenomenonTime and resultTime, in OMS we also have validTime. Under 8.4 Forecasts I read "A forecast may be represented as an observation where the value of sosa:phenomenonTime is later in time than the sosa:resultTime."
Do we leave this inconsistency, try to explain it, align it...?
We need to clarify is sosa:System also gets a sosa:SystemOfInterest (parallel to sosa:Property and sosa:PropertyOfInterest), see #107 before we can finalize section 8.6 Generic or Specific Instances of sosa:System
Except for the bits listed here, looks good to go
In SOSA we only have phenomenonTime and resultTime, in OMS we also have validTime. Under 8.4 Forecasts I read "A forecast may be represented as an observation where the value of sosa:phenomenonTime is later in time than the sosa:resultTime."
Do we leave this inconsistency, try to explain it, align it...?
I don't see the inconsistency. validTime
might be a useful addition, but the explanation of times for a forecast is correct with just "sosa:phenomenonTime
is later than sosa:resultTime
".
The thing that bothers me about this example is that the number is encoded as a String. Which means the reader can't be sure the writer used decimal point or comma... Is there a way around this?
Yes, I believe that in RDF any literal that is not typed as a number is a string.
If http://qudt.org/vocab/unit/DEG_C
was asserted to be a sub-class of xsd:decimal
then perhaps it would be OK?
In the JSON encoding if the quotes are dropped from "19.9" does that make it a number?
We need to clarify is sosa:System also gets a sosa:SystemOfInterest (parallel to sosa:Property and sosa:PropertyOfInterest), see #107 before we can finalize section 8.6 Generic or Specific Instances of sosa:System
The conversation seems to be converging. See #209
In the JSON encoding if the quotes are dropped from "19.9" does that make it a number?
Yes, without the quotes it's a proper number.
Streamlined Common Modeling Questions section with TTL and JSON-LD examples. The patterns for location and unit-of-measure are now more prescriptive.
Preview here: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/197-common-modeling-questions/ssn/index.html#common-modeling-questions