Closed rob-metalinkage closed 1 month ago
Yes, I spotted that when doing my consistency check in https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/commit/5d06e85c172015dafd3347587890c2a3a4ff1f8c
I think the solution is to clean up the diagrams and documentation elsewhere, not willy-nilly move alignment terms into the core.
SamplingCollection PR is now merged, with consistency improvements.
validTime
now only mentioned in OMS alignment.
See https://w3c.github.io/sdw-sosa-ssn/ssn/ to verify.
validTime is defined in alignments:
https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/ontology/alignments/sosa-oms.ttl#L384
but referenced like any other time property in description of sosa:ObservationCollection which is in sosa: namespace here:
https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/ontology/core/sosa-observation.ttl#L65
Feels like it should just be promoted to sosa: namespace to reduce complexity.
Note validTime is a property of an observation in SensorThings
https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/ontology/core/sosa-observation.ttl#L65