search

w3c / sdw

Repository for the Spatial Data on the Web Working Group
https://www.w3.org/2020/sdw/
148 stars 81 forks source link

Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices Example 2 has wrong coordinate axes #1118

Closed nmtoken closed 1 year ago

nmtoken commented 5 years ago

In EXAMPLE 2: Eddystone Lighthouse geometry (encoded as GeoJSON [RFC7946]) the document has:

...
  {
  “geometry”: {
    “type”: “Point”,
    “coordinates”: [50.184, -4.268]
  }
}

....

which is incorrect. GeoJSON RFC7946 has Coordinate Reference System of urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC::CRS84 which expresses coordinates in longitude/latitude order

So the coordinates should be [-4.268,50.184] just off the South coast of the the UK.

MichaelGordon commented 5 years ago

Committed the change in https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commit/d7c499a78f0c03bcbf3abd598197b7de5fa7a2e3

@tidoust - I completely forgot, how do we publish out the change to the w3 site?

tidoust commented 5 years ago

@tidoust - I completely forgot, how do we publish out the change to the w3 site?

The document is a Note, so on W3C side, all we need is a group's call for consensus and then decision to publish an update. Not sure whether more is needed from an OGC perspective.

ogcscotts commented 5 years ago

Because the document is a Best Practice on the OGC side, it would need an electronic vote for update.

lvdbrink commented 5 years ago

@ogcscotts even for a corrigendum?

ogcscotts commented 5 years ago

@lvdbrink We only have a corrigendum process for standards. Best Practices are versioned, but each update is a new version. I'd be willing to ask the TC if such a minor update could be accepted by corrigendum process and if we have no objection, then proceed.

lvdbrink commented 5 years ago

It would be great if you could try that!

MichaelGordon commented 4 years ago

@lvdbrink We only have a corrigendum process for standards. Best Practices are versioned, but each update is a new version. I'd be willing to ask the TC if such a minor update could be accepted by corrigendum process and if we have no objection, then proceed.

@ogcscotts Have we been able to advance this? I saw from Opening Plenary you were looking at PnP changes for corrigendium process for Community Standards, but have we looked at Best Practices process?

ogcscotts commented 4 years ago

@MichaelGordon The expansion of the corrigendum process is also planned to include Best Practices and Community Practices... I just forgot to say so in the plenary!

MichaelGordon commented 4 years ago

@MichaelGordon The expansion of the corrigendum process is also planned to include Best Practices and Community Practices... I just forgot to say so in the plenary!

Awesome, thanks. I'd suggest we wait for that to land and then we can take this very minor change through.