Closed PeterParslow closed 1 year ago
There's been an update in the dataset and the URL turns out not to be persistent. 2016 is the year the dataset was published. The new URL is:
https://geodata.nationaalgeoregister.nl/wijkenbuurten2020/wfs?request=GetCapabilities
But do we still want WFS examples in the BP?
I would prefer an OGC API Features endpoint if one is available.
So would I, but I'm afraid in NL there are no production-level OGC API Feature endpoints yet (that I know of). My suggestion then is to change to a different example.
We (Meteorological Service of Canada) have production OGC API (Features/Coverages/Processes/etc.) endpoints. Happy to jump in if this helps.
@tomkralidis that would be great. Could you suggest an example for us?
For Features, British Geological Survey have our 625k geology production service setup if you'd like to use this - https://ogcapi.bgs.ac.uk/collections/BGSGeology625kBedrock
We'll be adding further collections shortly + OGCAPI-Tiles
@tomkralidis that would be great. Could you suggest an example for us?
Sure. I'll issue a PR in the next few days.
PR in #1353. Happy to add more examples if desired.
The links in Example 14 return an HTTP 404 JSON object. It appears that the Dutch Nationaal georegister has moved, perhaps to https://www.pdok.nl/ and no longer has a WFS for "wijkenbuurten2016"
However, this may only be temporary, as the same WFS endpoint is still advertised (within a PDF) on https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/dossier/nederland-regionaal/cartografische-toegang/geoservices-bij-het-cbs
Suggest: get advice from NL or switch to a different example WFS (if we're retaining WFS examples!)