Does your document have an in-line Security Considerations section, ideally one separate from the Privacy Considerations? If not, corrrect that before proceeding further.
There is still time to add any security-related issues to PNG Third Edition. W are getting ready to publish an updated WD for TAG review, before moving to CR.
We prefers groups to run a self-review around the time of FPWD. See https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/.
If you still want us to review your spec, please provide the information below.
In the issue title above add the document name followed by the date of this request.
name of spec to be reviewed:
URL of spec: [This must be a dated version in the TR namespace, not an editor's draft.]
Does your document have an in-line Security Considerations section, ideally one separate from the Privacy Considerations? If not, corrrect that before proceeding further.
Do you need a reply by a particular date?
Please point to the results of your own self-review (see https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/)
Where and how to file issues arising?
Pointer to any explainer for the spec?
Other comments:
We are heavily constrained by the excellent backwards compatibility with PNG images since 1994.
We are primarily interested in comments on the new (or newly-standardized) features
Current issues with 'security-tracker'