Closed Honry closed 5 years ago
@anssiko and all, PTAL. Thanks!
Thanks @Honry!
Since the contents of this PR has already been reviewed in #369 I'll just focus my comments on how to possibly split test automation spec bits across specs.
All - would you prefer to see mock sensor types (sections 9.1.3.*) integrated into corresponding concrete sensor specs? That might make maintenance easier if/when those specs add new API surface that need to be accompanied with corresponding new mock sensor reading values.
Also, to acknowledge @Honry's contributions to testing and automation and make it clear to folks who to contact for testing related bits in the spec, I'd suggest adding the following to the headers:
!Test Facilitator: Wanming Lin (Intel Corporation)
@anssiko, thank you for the acknowledgment!
I think with a standalone issue would be better to track your suggestion on integration of mock sensor types into corresponding concrete sensor specs. And I just made it at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/378, and please feel free to assign it to me. :)
The merge into this spec looks good. @anssiko are you okay with merging this PR as-is and then splitting out the mock sensor type definitions to the appropriate specs or should that work happen first?
I'm fine with that. Let's merge. @Honry to take the lead in splitting the mock sensor types into appropriate concrete specs in separate PRs.
This is just copy and paste to move WebDriver Extension API into a new section "Automation" in Generic Sensor spec with some necessary adjustment on the sections and editorial alignment.
Preview | Diff