use "SHACL-C" or "SHACLC"?

w3c / shacl

SHACL Community Group (Post-REC activitities)

32 stars 5 forks source link

Open VladimirAlexiev opened 3 months ago

VladimirAlexiev commented 3 months ago

I've been writing "SHACLC" but that sometimes can be confused with "SHACL".
@jeswr writes "SHACL-C".
shaclc https://github.com/search?q=shaclc&type=repositories finds 5 repos but shacl-c doesn't find relevant repos (it finds things related to SHACL)

@HolgerKnublauch and @jeswr what do you think?

jeswr commented 3 months ago

No strong opinions on my side; leaning slightly towards SHACL-C for readability as you say, but some points supporting SHALCLC are:

ShEx Compact Syntax uses ShExC
The file extension is .shc / .shalclc and the mediatype is already text/shaclc not text/shacl-c

TallTed commented 3 months ago

I strongly prefer and advise selection of SHACL-C

pronunciation is more obviously suggested	spelling	reads as	syllables
`SHACL`	`/SHAK-uhl/`	2	base
`SHACLC`	`/SHAK-uhlk/`	2	easily mis-heard as `SHACL`
`SHACL-C`	`/SHAK-uhl-see/`	3	helped by hyphen
`ShEx`	`/sheks/`	1	base
`ShExC`	`/shek-see/`	2	helped by Pascal case
`ShEx-C`	`/shek-see/`	2	helped by hyphen

afs commented 3 months ago

Are there going to other SHACL* names? A consistent pattern is best.

I don't recall seeing alternatives to SHACL-AF and SHACL-UI. Running those together would not look great.

SHACL-C