search

w3c / silver

Accessibility Guidelines "Silver"
https://w3c.github.io/silver/
Other
199 stars 44 forks source link

Technology scope update #734

Closed alastc closed 6 months ago

alastc commented 7 months ago

Closes #224

rachaelbradley commented 7 months ago

I am personally OK with this change but several members have over the past year questioned whether we should provide a conformance model. This change will commit us to doing so.

GreggVan commented 6 months ago

Although one technically can have a standard without a conformance model — it is unclear how to conform. Or you can’t clearly say what you need to do to conform.

In such cases I think it becomes more of an Informal Standard — more of an informal guideline or best practices document, lacking the formal structure and rigor of a traditional standard with a clear conformance model.

Gregg

On Mar 5, 2024, at 5:14 AM, rachaelbradley @.***> wrote:

I am personally OK with this change but several members have over the past year questioned whether we should provide a conformance model. This change will commit us to doing so.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/734#issuecomment-1978752854, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACNGDXUGBCJ3FZIZ4IY4KXLYWXAKXAVCNFSM6AAAAABD4GLMCSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZYG42TEOBVGQ. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.