Open drscottlobo opened 3 weeks ago
I just tried this myself in TextEdit on my Mac, and the 4/4 time signature appears as expected. I'm not sure about how to do this in a React app, but so far as I can see, the ligature is working correctly.
Ok thanks! Maybe something to do with how the template string renders in the html. Thanks Daniel!Scott ___Scott Wolf, DMAOxnard College - Professor of MusicOn Oct 11, 2024, at 2:33 PM, Daniel Spreadbury @.***> wrote: I just tried this myself in TextEdit on my Mac, and the 4/4 time signature appears as expected. I'm not sure about how to do this in a React app, but so far as I can see, the ligature is working correctly.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi there! I love Bravura text and really appreciate all the awesome work that has been put into the SMUFL spec! I'm currently using Bravura Text in a webpage to display time signatures. I'm using a template string like this to render a 2/4 time signature in a react app like this:
I'm following the spec's instructions for combining time signature numerator and denominator: "uniE09E_uniE082_uniE09F_uniE084" per the SMUFL specification on this page: https://w3c.github.io/smufl/latest/tables/time-signatures.html?highlight=time%20sig#time-signatures-ue080ue09f
The issue is that the TimeSigCombNumerator isn't functioning as expected, instead it is placing both numbers in the denominator place, which means I end up with the 2/4 overlapping each other in the denominator place. Is it possible the TimeSigCombNumerator just has a bug that is placing the text in the wrong vertical space?
Thanks for any help!