w3c / sparql-query

https://w3c.github.io/sparql-query/
Other
9 stars 0 forks source link

Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts #155

Open rubensworks opened 2 months ago

rubensworks commented 2 months ago

As suggested by @gkellogg in https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/pull/152#discussion_r1735203153, it would make sense to move the RDF Dataset Merge definition to RDF Semantics or Concepts, and reference it from the SPARQL query spec.

afs commented 3 weeks ago

Current definition of RDF Dataset Merge in section 18.1.1 RDF Dataset.

pfps commented 3 weeks ago

Will be put into Section 10 of Semantics.

pchampin commented 2 weeks ago

This was discussed during the rdf-star meeting on 31 October 2024.

View the transcript

Move RDF Dataset Merge to RDF Semantics or RDF Concepts 3

ktk: we can continue this offline

gkellogg: not a strong opinion, but RDF Semantics seems the right place for this definition
… this is currently defined in SPARQL Query

<gkellogg> https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/pull/152#discussion_r1735203153

<gb> Pull Request 152 Use RDF Dataset definition from RDF Concepts (by rubensworks) [spec:substantive]

pfps: I don't see a problem about putting it in RDF semantics
… it makes sense to have a section on dataset merging in semantics

<enrico> +1 to pfps (add to section 10)

pfps: graph merge is in semantics

<TallTed> +1 to putting Dataset Merge in same document as Graph Merge

<niklasl> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset "Definition: RDF Dataset Merge"

<pfps> it would likely go in section 10.

<AndyS> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql12-query/#sparqlDataset

pfps: don't close the issue until we have a proposed content

<enrico> Document RDF semantics section 4.1 Shared blank nodes, unions and merges

ktk: 5 min left, let's jump to AOB

enrico: I want to look at the writing in RDF 1.2 Semantics
… what's the process for updating the doc

ktk: Semantic TF tomorrow is also 1 hour earlier for the Europeans

<ktk> s/smenatics/semantics/