search

w3c / src

Other
7 stars 7 forks source link

Is transactionType useful for SRC? #7

Closed ianbjacobs closed 5 years ago

ianbjacobs commented 5 years ago

Do we need a request parameter for transactionType? (e.g., Purchase, P2P).

ianbjacobs commented 5 years ago

From 15 May discussion, this parameter would not be a filtering param but more for tailoring response data or backend behavior based on transaction type.

ianbjacobs commented 5 years ago

From 29 May discussion [1] the conclusion is that this parameter is useful. We plan to update the payment method definition with information from the SRC specification when it is made publicly available.

[1] https://www.w3.org/2019/05/29-wpwg-minutes#item02

ianbjacobs commented 5 years ago

In SRC 1.0, I see that Transaction Types are defined in "Recommendations for EMV Processing for Industry-Specific Transaction Types" [1], but that document is labeled as being for "Contact" transactions and is from 2016. I will ask the task force for clarification.

[1] https://www.emvco.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/Recommendations-for-EMV-Processing-for-Industry-Specific-Transaction-Type.pdf

ianbjacobs commented 5 years ago

At the 12 June task force call [1] we resolved to include an optional transactionType parameter that refers to the EMVCO API spec for authoritative information, but includes 5 values inline for convenience. The rationale for inclusion is that the response or backend behavior may change based on this information.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/src/issues/7