Distributed Tracing Working Group Charter 2020

[plehegar]

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

Charter:

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

• Existing
  • [x] Existing WG recharter
  • If this is a charter extension or revision, link a diff from previous charter, and any issue discussion:

Horizontal Reviews (intended to be checked only by horizontal reviewers when they are satisfied with the charter)

• [x] Accessibility (a11y)
• [x] Internationalization (i18n)
• [ ] Privacy
• [ ] Security

Communities suggested for outreach: The group is already in communication with Open Telemetry

Known or potential areas of concern?: security, privacy

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (github preferred, email, ...) https://github.com/w3c/distributed-tracing-wg/issues

Anything else we should think about as we review? nope

@mtwo @SergeyKanzhelev @danielkhan

[michael-n-cooper]

APA WG has no comments. Over to @brewerj to complete a11y horizontal review.

[wseltzer]

@samuelweiler could you please take a look

[himorin]

No request from i18n WG.

[samuelweiler]

Opened two issues: https://github.com/w3c/distributed-tracing-wg/issues/35 and https://github.com/w3c/distributed-tracing-wg/issues/36

Summary: I want clarification on if and when these specs are intended to touch the browser and, if they do, a specific plan (or work item added) for how to request user consent for temporarily enabling support.

Also see: https://github.com/w3c/trace-context/issues/392

[brewerj]

Confirming no accessibility issues to address.

[samuelweiler]

The snapshot circulated for internal review, linked above, needs a marker that it's out of date.

A new shapshot has gone out for member review.

[samuelweiler]

Call for review was supposed to close on 23 June and has apparently been extended.

[wseltzer]

Re-charter approved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2020Aug/0008.html