Closed plehegar closed 3 years ago
cc @jakearchibald @jungkees
No comments from APA, we had reviewed with no comments the Service Workers spec. In a future charter with new deliverables, APA may have more interest. Over to @brewerj to complete accessibility horizontal review.
Security and privacy reviews completed. No security nor privacy issues on the charter. Editorial issues on the charter filed in https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/307 https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/308 https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/309 https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/310 https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/313 and https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/issues/314.
Also filed two issues on the Service Workers spec.
I prefer to see more than one chair for most WGs, and I'm disappointed to see only one here.
No comment/request from i18n.
APA has no comments. Over to @brewerj to complete accessibility horizontal review.
@samuelweiler , regarding the Chairs, this is still under discussion. @ylafon has an action item from W3M.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Charter:
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach: none
Known or potential areas of concern: none
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...) https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts
Anything else we should think about as we review? Nope