Closed iherman closed 1 year ago
No comments from APA, over to @brewerj to complete accessibility horizontal review.
Can we issue an advanced notice? Actually, is this a requirement for a maintenance WG?
we should send an advance notice indeed. @wseltzer ?
Sure, now that there's something to point at, please send the advance notice @iherman
Sure, now that there's something to point at, please send the advance notice @iherman
Done, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/team-strat/2021Aug/0005.html
No comment/request from i18n.
No security or privacy issues.
APA would like to draw attention to recent updates to https://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/. There are issues filed on this on which APA would like to collaborate with DID.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review: Decentralized Identifier Working Group Charter
Charter: https://w3c.github.io/did-wg-charter/
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Diff from previous charter. But the diff does not really make sense in this case. The previous (ie, current) charter is: https://www.w3.org/2020/12/did-wg-charter.html.
Issues at:
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
Known or potential areas of concern:
n/a
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
None
cc: @brentzundel @msporny @burnburn