Timed-Text WG 2022

[himorin]

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

Charter:

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

• New

  • [ ] New WG
  • [ ] New IG
  • If this is a new WG or IG charter request, link to [Advance Notice](), and any issue discussion:

• Existing

  • [x] Existing WG recharter
  • [ ] Existing IG recharter
  • If this is a charter extension or revision, link a diff from previous charter, and any issue discussion:

• current charter: to 2021/Dec/31

• diff

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.

Communities suggested for outreach: (no new)

Known or potential areas of concern:

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? : github

Anything else we should think about as we review?

[himorin]

/cc @nigelmegitt @gkatsev

[himorin]

• section 2.1 would be removed
• one update is planned for success criteria section: https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pull/67/files

[samuelweiler]

I added a card for this issue in the pipeline.

• section 2.1 would be removed
• one update is planned for success criteria section: https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pull/67/files

@himorin, given the above and the generally rough shape of the charter, I encourage you to remove the horizontal-review-requested label for now and add it again when you think the charter is closer to ready.

[himorin]

• section 2.1 would be removed
• one update is planned for success criteria section: https://github.com/w3c/charter-timed-text/pull/67/files

@himorin, given the above and the generally rough shape of the charter, I encourage you to remove the horizontal-review-requested label for now and add it again when you think the charter is closer to ready.

@plehegar is it ok to remove the label for now? (should be short like within this week to get approved by chairs on changes...)

[samuelweiler]

Yes, it's okay. :-)

[himorin]

No comment/request from i18n.

[plehegar]

Approved by W3M: https://www.w3.org/2022/02/16-w3m-minutes.html#t05

[samuelweiler]

I notice that you reformatted the "success criteria" section from the template. If you think those changes are worthwhile, perhaps file them as a PR against the template? https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/blob/gh-pages/charter-template.html

Overtaken by events, but no security or privacy issues. I filed an issue about the history section of the charter.

[svgeesus]

Existing charter was extended until 31 March 2023.

[himorin]

charter out https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2023Apr/0008.html https://www.w3.org/2023/04/timed-text-wg-charter.html