Closed himorin closed 1 year ago
note: remaining Patent Disclosures
section will be removed shortly.
In the coordination section, there is a reference to APA WG:
Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group The APA Working Group will review deliverables for accessibility implications and help develop solutions.
Since we now have a resource that helps id user needs in XR space, I recommend that you add a note linking to XAUR as a resource for ideas about solutions:
s/help develop solutions, noting the following XAUR resource.
No comments from APA.
updated draft:
No comment/request from i18n
@pes10k, @samuelweiler could you kindly check this draft per privacy (and security)?
No privacy or security comments. Many of these specs will be "exciting" from a privacy perspective, but the WG has a good history of addressing issues, so I'm not raising any issues with the charter.
I filed three issues re: the history/change log section.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Charter:
diff from current running
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
New
Existing
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach: nothing
Known or potential areas of concern: nothing
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...): repository for this charter
Anything else we should think about as we review? : nothing