CSS WG rechartering

[svgeesus]

Charter Review

Draft charter

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

• Existing
  • [x] Existing WG recharter

diff

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, and security. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.

Communities suggested for outreach:

Known or potential areas of concern:

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)

• CSS WG GitHub issue

Anything else we should think about as we review?

• See discussion at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7468

[himorin]

history table lacks a link to the current running charter as https://www.w3.org/2020/12/css-wg-charter.html (at bottom line)?

[ruoxiran]

We are looking forward to discussing accessible navigation on TPAC, there is no other comment from APA WG.

[svgeesus]

lacks a link to the current running charter

Thanks for noticing, will fix.

[svgeesus]

@himorin any other comments from an I18n perspective? Are you the one reviewing the charter, or did you just happen to notice the missing link?

[svgeesus]

@samuelweiler any comments from your perspective?

[svgeesus]

@wseltzer I discussed W3M review with @PLH and he agreed to be one reviewer; we also thought that W3M review could start even before horizontal review is complete.

Could you be the other reviewer? (I know you are very busy now with LE bylaws and such, so "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer)

[himorin]

no comment/request from i18n. (Sorry for delay on responding after 1 week internal discussion slot)

[svgeesus]

Sorry for delay on responding

No problem at all. I'm hoping to have this charter discussed at the 24 Aug W3M, so thanks for completing your review well before that!

[svgeesus]

@swickr is the second reviewer.

[svgeesus]

@samuelweiler any comments? If not, please mark the privacy and security review as complete?

[samuelweiler]

With apologies for the delay, no comments.

[plehegar]

In 4.1:

I think you want to adjust the digital publishing group: s/Audiobooks Working Group/EPub 3 Working Group/

[[ Web Applications Working Group The Group reviews the Selectors API module, being developed by the Web Applications Working Group. ]]

Selectors API was abandoned and moved in the DOM spec in 2020.

I don't think there is a need to liaise with WebApps anymore

[svgeesus]

@plh I believe both your comments are addressed.

@swickr did you have comments? (If sent by email my apologies, I still have a backlog)

[plehegar]

(waiting to start the AC review)

[svgeesus]

approved by w3m

3 month extension for AC review

[svgeesus]

Contribution from Fuqiao 30% → 10%

[svgeesus]

Formal objection from fantasai

Suggested replacement text looks fine, but this is a comment on the charter template not specifically on the CSS WG proposed charter.

[svgeesus]

Formal objection resolved, w3m approval requested.

[svgeesus]

w3m approved 11 Jan 2023