search

w3c / strategy

team-strat, on GitHub, working in public. Current state: DRAFT
158 stars 47 forks source link

[wg/i18n-core, ig/i18n] i18n WG & IG rechartering 2024 #468

Closed xfq closed 1 month ago

xfq commented 5 months ago

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

WG Charter

IG Charter

If applicable:

diff from previous WG charter

diff from previous IG charter

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.

Communities suggested for outreach: none

Known or potential areas of concern: none

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? this strategy funnel issue

Anything else we should think about as we review? no

/cc @aphillips @duerst

simoneonofri commented 5 months ago

no comments on the Security side :)

as we said let's keep aligned on how to do the various reviews

himorin commented 5 months ago

no comment or request from i18n

ruoxiran commented 5 months ago

no comment or request from APA for those two charters.

plehegar commented 4 months ago

In the WG charter, the changelog can be updated to remove a past change about the chair.

The IG and WG charters are not aligned with the charter template. For example:

Please align those charters with the charter template.

You're asking for 3 years instead of the usual 2 years for the duration of the WG/IG. Is that intentional ? I won't object to it because those 2 Groups are core to our mission but we may get pushback from the AC.

xfq commented 4 months ago

Thanks, @plehegar. Please see comments below.

In the WG charter, the changelog can be updated to remove a past change about the chair.

Done.

The IG and WG charters are not aligned with the charter template. For example:

  • the link and last two words for the Patent Disclosures deviate from the charter template. Please align with the charter template for those bits.

I have fixed the WG charter.

For the IG charter, it doesn't seem to have a licensing information page. https://www.w3.org/groups/ig/i18n/ipr/ is 404. Is it because the IG is essentially a mailing list?

  • We updated recently the links to the patent policy and process document in the charter template, please align.

Updated.

  • The Communication sections don't mention the W3C Process nor the Code of Conduct.

I compared the charter and the template, but didn't find see the W3C Process or the Code of Conduct mentioned. Am I missing something?

Please align those charters with the charter template.

Done.

You're asking for 3 years instead of the usual 2 years for the duration of the WG/IG. Is that intentional ? I won't object to it because those 2 Groups are core to our mission but we may get pushback from the AC.

I'm asking for 3 years, because the work of the i18n groups is relatively stable and the scope/deliverables generally does not change much. Also, the last charter period was also 3 years (2021-2024).

siusin commented 4 months ago

The Success Criteria section is missing from the IG charter.

xfq commented 3 months ago

The Success Criteria section is missing from the IG charter.

Thanks. Added now: https://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/i18n-ig/charter.html#success-criteria

plehegar commented 2 months ago

Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization Working Group and Interest Group (until 2024-09-24/25)

xfq commented 1 month ago

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2024OctDec/0020.html