Open bert-github opened 4 months ago
Overall the charter looks good.
I was unsure what this sentence was intended to mean:
The following existing specifications are potentially in scope for maintenance:
In particular, it lacks a "motivation and background" section
I see that it does now have that section.
APA would like to be listed in the liaison groups. so we want to hear about work in the early stages, is that, whilst you are developing low-level APIs, there may be semantic metadata that have an impact on accessibility – either things we’d like you to include to promote accessibility, or accessibility risks relating to things you are proposing to include.
no comment or request from i18n
No comment from PING
Some copy-editing improvements:
No comments from Security
no comments from APA.
You could delete
Note:Display this table and update it when appropriate. Requirements for charter extension history are documented in the Charter Guidebook (section 4).
Deleted.
The spec name in the 4th bullet of the Scope Sec. is missing.
Fixed.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Proposed SDW WG charter
diff from charter template
Diff from previous charter
chair dashboard
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
New
Existing
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
Known or potential areas of concern:
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...): w3c/charter-drafts
Anything else we should think about as we review?
Note: proposed chairs should be copied @... on this issue: @ldesousa, @rob-metalinkage