w3c / transitions

W3C Transitions
https://www.w3.org/Guide/transitions/
72 stars 30 forks source link

CR Request for EPUB 3.3, EPUB 3.3 Reading Systems, and EPUB 3 Accessibility 1.1 #427

Closed iherman closed 2 years ago

iherman commented 2 years ago

Document title, URLs, estimated publication date

(The documents are not yet installed on /TR, please look at either the editors' drafts or using the short names.)

Abstract

Status

Link to group's decision to request transition

Note: that resolution was made on the 8th of April, and a 5 business day window was announced for objections. That period is over on April 15, at noon Boston time.

Changes

Minimum deadline for CR comments

2022-10-30

Requirements satisfied

Quoting from the main requirements in the WG charter:

[…] the interoperability of EPUB 3 content, and the conformance of EPUB 3 reading systems, remain a serious issue. There is a need for a more rigorous and comprehensive testing of EPUB 3; this may also mean the need for a further clarification of the standard text itself. […] The EPUB 3 Working Group will advance, refine, and clarify the EPUB 3 standard to ensure its relevance as digital publishing continues to evolve, and specify a comprehensive testing environment for EPUB 3.

The WG has:

The WG believes that fully satisfied the requirement for the clarifications needed in the specification, as well as specifying a comprehensive testing environment.

Dependencies met (or not)

There were no major dependencies.

Wide Review

Horizontal reviews:

See horizontal review tracker

The WG discussions were conducted through github issues. The group took over the repository used to develop earlier versions of EPUB, and that meant ≈100 open issues at the time the Working Group started (September 2020); some of those were around for years. During the lifetime of the Working Group ≈400 issues were added, coming both from the wider community and the Working Group itself, with the participation of experts outside the group.

Issues addressed

The change log items listing the substantial changes, i.e.:

include references to the issues that were addressed by those changes.

Formal Objections

None.

Implementation

The exit criteria of the Working Group are described in:

with links to the report documents that will, eventually, contain the results of testing.

There are numerous EPUB 3 Reading System implementations on the market, some major ones are represented on the Working Group (Google, Apple, Kobo, EDRLab, VitalSource, Colibrio, etc.). We expect most of these will contribute to the test results. Also, the group has numerous contacts with Publishers, as well as accessibility organizations, who can contribute to the CR testing of, e.g., vocabularies.

Finally, there is a strong cooperation between the Working Group and the developers of epubcheck, that already has a beta version of an EPUB 3.3 checker. (This is particularly important, because epubcheck is used by virtually all publishers before releasing a new publication.)

We expect the CR period open until the end of December 2022.

Patent disclosures

https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/epub/ipr

Additional note on CR exit

The Working Group's charter has a very strong clause on backward compatibility:

Any existing valid EPUB 3.2 should remain valid under EPUB 3.X, unless it relies on features discovered to have serious issues (such as a security bug).

What this means that the usual CR approach, whereby if a feature does not get the right number of implementation per the exit criteria must be removed from the specification, cannot be applied in this case. Instead, the WG has introduced a special category called "under-implemented features" to mark those features in the final publication.


Cc @dauwhe @mattgarrish @shiestyle @wareid

plehegar commented 2 years ago

Horizontal review requests: APA, PING, Security, TAG, i18n

i18n request was in March 2021. PING request did not include EPub a11y document.

plehegar commented 2 years ago

PING: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-epub-wg/2022Apr/0021.html Waiting on i18n to confirm.

plehegar commented 2 years ago

i18n confirmed it's ok to move.

plehegar commented 2 years ago

Normative references:

swickr commented 2 years ago

Transition approved.

plehegar commented 2 years ago

(for future editorial comment) ACTION: plh to suggest to drop the normative reference do DOM L2 Style and the mention of getOverrideStyle in Epub Reading Systems.

iherman commented 2 years ago

Publication request has been sent: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/webreq/2022May/0013.html

iherman commented 2 years ago

The CR has been published, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2022AprJun/0032.html

iherman commented 2 years ago

Transition happened, closing.