Closed iherman closed 2 years ago
PING: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-epub-wg/2022Apr/0021.html Waiting on i18n to confirm.
i18n confirmed it's ok to move.
Transition approved.
(for future editorial comment) ACTION: plh to suggest to drop the normative reference do DOM L2 Style and the mention of getOverrideStyle in Epub Reading Systems.
Publication request has been sent: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/webreq/2022May/0013.html
The CR has been published, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2022AprJun/0032.html
Transition happened, closing.
Document title, URLs, estimated publication date
(The documents are not yet installed on /TR, please look at either the editors' drafts or using the short names.)
Abstract
Status
Link to group's decision to request transition
Note: that resolution was made on the 8th of April, and a 5 business day window was announced for objections. That period is over on April 15, at noon Boston time.
Changes
Minimum deadline for CR comments
2022-10-30
Requirements satisfied
Quoting from the main requirements in the WG charter:
The WG has:
The WG believes that fully satisfied the requirement for the clarifications needed in the specification, as well as specifying a comprehensive testing environment.
Dependencies met (or not)
There were no major dependencies.
Wide Review
Horizontal reviews:
See horizontal review tracker
i18n-tracker
issues (all closed)i18n-needs-resolution
issues (all closed)privacy tracker
issuesThe WG discussions were conducted through github issues. The group took over the repository used to develop earlier versions of EPUB, and that meant ≈100 open issues at the time the Working Group started (September 2020); some of those were around for years. During the lifetime of the Working Group ≈400 issues were added, coming both from the wider community and the Working Group itself, with the participation of experts outside the group.
Issues addressed
The change log items listing the substantial changes, i.e.:
include references to the issues that were addressed by those changes.
Formal Objections
None.
Implementation
The exit criteria of the Working Group are described in:
with links to the report documents that will, eventually, contain the results of testing.
There are numerous EPUB 3 Reading System implementations on the market, some major ones are represented on the Working Group (Google, Apple, Kobo, EDRLab, VitalSource, Colibrio, etc.). We expect most of these will contribute to the test results. Also, the group has numerous contacts with Publishers, as well as accessibility organizations, who can contribute to the CR testing of, e.g., vocabularies.
Finally, there is a strong cooperation between the Working Group and the developers of epubcheck, that already has a beta version of an EPUB 3.3 checker. (This is particularly important, because epubcheck is used by virtually all publishers before releasing a new publication.)
We expect the CR period open until the end of December 2022.
Patent disclosures
https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/epub/ipr
Additional note on CR exit
The Working Group's charter has a very strong clause on backward compatibility:
What this means that the usual CR approach, whereby if a feature does not get the right number of implementation per the exit criteria must be removed from the specification, cannot be applied in this case. Instead, the WG has introduced a special category called "under-implemented features" to mark those features in the final publication.
Cc @dauwhe @mattgarrish @shiestyle @wareid