Closed iherman closed 1 year ago
plehegar
commented
1 year ago The normative reference to PNG links to the latest version of PNG, which is the Third Edition. While the reference section means to use the Second Edition which is the latest recommendation. Is that intended? You may want to use the latest link instead.
It is expected that the reference to WebP will be updated in the upcoming future.
Approved for publication as Recommendations.
mattgarrish
commented
1 year ago The normative reference to PNG links to the latest version of PNG, which is the Third Edition. While the reference section means to use the Second Edition which is the latest recommendation.
That comes straight from specref: https://www.specref.org/?q=png
As far as I'm aware, we can't override it unless we devise a new reference name (png-2?) and put it in a local biblio file -- or hack some javascript to post-process the specification.
iherman
commented
1 year ago Publication request sent: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/webreq/2023May/0019.html
iherman
commented
1 year ago Recommendations published, see, e.g., https://www.w3.org/2023/05/pressrelease-epub33-rec.html.en
Closing.
Pointer to the internal transition request mail:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/w3t-comm/2023May/0080.html
Document titles, URLs, estimated publication dates
Abstract
Status
Link to group's decision to request transition
Wide Review
No change since PR Request (see #496)
Dependencies
No change since PR Request (see #496)
Issues addressed
Since #496 four minor (essentially editorial) issues have been raised, which will be recorded as errata after the publication. All other open issues have been deferred by the WG before #496.
See https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/
Link to internal AC Review results
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/epub-pr/results
Formal Objections
None.
cc @wareid @shiestyle @dauwhe @mattgarrish