Sorry for the late notice, I think I'm going to have to ask you to hold this while we return to the question of if this is an updateable rec or not - I only noticed from this transition request that it is not but I see now that we did not put the right text into the SOTD. I would like to return this question to the TTWG and check if we have consensus to change it before we publish as a Rec.

Issue raised as w3c/imsc-hrm#78.

nigelmegitt commented 9 months ago

CfC raised at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2024Jan/0006.html

nigelmegitt commented 9 months ago

Cfc concluded at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2024Feb/0002.html with no objections.

@himorin please could you adjust this transition request to change "Will new features be allowed to be incorporated in the Recommendation?" to "Yes" and then proceed, i.e. take this off "hold"?

himorin commented 9 months ago

@himorin please could you adjust this transition request to change "Will new features be allowed to be incorporated in the Recommendation?" to "Yes" and then proceed, i.e. take this off "hold"?

changed with adding a link to the resolution.

plehegar commented 9 months ago

Diff from previous CR Snapshot

plehegar commented 9 months ago

The Working Group reported using around 28,502 documents against one of the validating implementation (as discussed with the Council). This was done in addition to using 2 validating implementations against the hand-crafted test suite.

Approved, but we'd like to see the final SOTD before publication (@himorin , pleaqse cc @ylafon and me on the publication request).

nigelmegitt commented 9 months ago

@plehegar I don't think we're expecting to make any particular changes to the SOTD relative to w3c/imsc-hrm#77 - is there something you are hoping to be present in that text, or removed from it? For example the addition of some description of how the CR exit criteria were met?

plehegar commented 9 months ago

@plehegar I don't think we're expecting to make any particular changes to the SOTD relative to w3c/imsc-hrm#77 - is there something you are hoping to be present in that text, or removed from it? For example the addition of some description of how the CR exit criteria were met?

Nope. Just wanted to make sure the SOTD is finalized porperly.

nigelmegitt commented 9 months ago

Late change to the SotD agreed, confirmed at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2024Feb/0007.html - removes the CR exit criteria, which were left in by oversight. I think this means we can continue with the transition, @himorin @plehegar as per w3c/imsc-hrm#77.

himorin commented 9 months ago

@nigelmegitt @plehegar A package installed at https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/PR-imsc-hrm-20240229/

I'll send out publication request shortly.

plehegar commented 8 months ago

https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/PR-imsc-hrm-20240229/

w3c / transitions

PR Request for IMSC Hypothetical Render Model (imsc-hrm) #590

Document title, URLs, estimated publication date

Abstract

Status

Will new features be allowed to be incorporated in the Recommendation?

Link to group's decision to request transition

Changes

Requirements satisfied

Dependencies met (or not)

Wide Review

Issues addressed

Formal Objections

Implementation

Patent disclosures