By publishing this Proposed Recommendation, W3C expects the functionality specified in this Proposed Recommendation will not be affected by changes to High Resolution Time Level 2 (CR) and Web Workers (WD) as these specifications proceed to Recommendation.
All issues for Level 1 have been addressed. The current open issues of Resource Timing(https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues) will be resolved in the future versions of the Resource Timing spec.
Formal Objections
No.
Implementation
We have 2+ implementations from the major browser venders (Chrome, Edge, and Firefox).
The failure in test_resource_timing.html is about nextHopProtocol, which is under discussion in Level 2 of this spec.
Document title, URLs, estimated publication date
Resource Timing Level 1 https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/PR-resource-timing-1-20170110/ 10 January 2017
Abstract
This specification defines an interface for web applications to access the complete timing information for resources in a document.
Status
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/PR-resource-timing-1-20170110/#sotd
Link to group's decision to request transition
https://www.w3.org/2016/12/14-webperf-minutes.html#item02
Changes
No.
Requirements satisfied
We have met 2+ implementations criteria, please see the Working Group's implementation report (https://w3c.github.io/test-results/resource-timing/all.html) of the major browser vendors.
Dependencies met (or not)
By publishing this Proposed Recommendation, W3C expects the functionality specified in this Proposed Recommendation will not be affected by changes to High Resolution Time Level 2 (CR) and Web Workers (WD) as these specifications proceed to Recommendation.
Wide Review
In addition to review by the WebPerf WG and the WebAppSec WG (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2016May/0074.html), the spec has multiple implementations including Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari.
Issues addressed
All issues for Level 1 have been addressed. The current open issues of Resource Timing(https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues) will be resolved in the future versions of the Resource Timing spec.
Formal Objections
No.
Implementation
We have 2+ implementations from the major browser venders (Chrome, Edge, and Firefox). The failure in test_resource_timing.html is about nextHopProtocol, which is under discussion in Level 2 of this spec.
Patent disclosures
https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/45211/status No relevant disclosure.