search

w3c / typography

Points to typographic information relevant to the Open Web Platform
https://w3c.github.io/typography/
42 stars 10 forks source link

Modern Greek gap analysis #62

Closed svgeesus closed 5 years ago

svgeesus commented 5 years ago

The document currently titled Greek Gap Analysis should probably be retitled Modern Greek Gap Analysis, for clarity. In other words it does not cover recent historical Polytonic Greek, nor Coptic Greek as used in the Orthodox Church, nor Ancient or Archaic Greek.

Otherwise, the gaps would be quite different (and rather more severe).

himorin commented 5 years ago

seems better to be filed against to https://github.com/w3c/eurlreq?

r12a commented 5 years ago

@svgeesus before i close this issue and move it to eurlreq repo, was there a particular link that led you here (rather than to eurlreq) that i should change?

r12a commented 5 years ago

Ah, i think i found it. The one in the big green box at the start, which i forgot to remove.

r12a commented 5 years ago

Ok, done. So i'll close this issue without moving it. Thanks for pointing that out @svgeesus, it also applied to the Georgian, Dutch and Hungarian docs (which all used an old template).

r12a commented 5 years ago

Btw, thanks for pointing out that bug in the gap-analysis doc, @svgeesus. It has been fixed for the Greek, Georgian, Hungarian, and Dutch gap analysis docs, which is why this is now closed.

If there's a need for additional discussion, please feel free to raise a new issue at https://github.com/w3c/eurlreq/issues

svgeesus commented 5 years ago

Thanks, Richard!

I'm aware of some people noodling slowly on an Ancient Greek gap analysis, so I thought it important to be clear here. I'm satisfied with the resolution.

r12a commented 5 years ago

Thanks also for suggesting the change of name for the Greek document. I felt it was appropriate, since our primary concern (at least initially) is to ensure the Web serves the needs of current users. We can always create a new doc for Ancient Greek if there is a need and if we have some expertise to bring to bear. But priorities-wise, modern users are currently highest in the frame.