Open chumbert opened 2 weeks ago
Is this second context intended to be hosted too
Yes.
should implementers that use VCDM 1.0 with bitstring status lists reference it from somewhere else, or am I simply missing the correct url to reference it ?
We haven't set the correct URL to reference it yet, it will likely be something like:
https://www.w3.org/ns/credentials/bitstring-status-list/v1
but we expect most people to use the v2.0 context, https://www.w3.org/ns/credentials/v2
, which includes it by default:
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/blob/main/contexts/credentials/v2#L142-L202
Does this answer your question?
If so, I'm going to keep this issue open because we do need to:
Thank you, this does answer my question. I'll keep an eye on this then.
Hello, I have a small question on referencing the Bitstring Status List context in VCDM 1.0 credentials:
With https://github.com/w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list/issues/91 and https://github.com/perma-id/w3id.org/pull/3662, we can refer to the
Status List 2021
context through w3c perma-ids.I am under the impression however that this same change prevents referencing the bistring status list context that's here: https://github.com/w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list/blob/main/contexts/v1.jsonld
Is this second context intended to be hosted too, should implementers that use VCDM 1.0 with bitstring status lists reference it from somewhere else, or am I simply missing the correct url to reference it ?
Kind regards.