Closed dlongley closed 2 months ago
I imagine a PR will make this plain, but I (and probably other readers) cannot yet be certain where you mean for the inclusion to be inserted. Possibly replacing the respectively.
in the penultimate sentence?
@TallTed,
Yes, sorry, that's what I meant (replacing the first "respectively" with the above suggestion) -- but, yes, a PR will make clear what the chosen text will be.
(@dlongley — One big reason I needed to ask is that there are two instances of respectively
in the quoted passage — respectively. This
and respectively, is
. I believe it's the first instance that you're replacing.)
Yes, I've updated my comments to indicate that, thanks!
PR #273 has been raised to address this issue. This issue will be closed once PR #273 has been merged.
PR #273 has been merged, closing.
This may be obvious to some implementers, but we should make this more clear. This section:
https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-integrity/#relationship-to-verifiable-credentials
Should include the text: "...respectively, and that the verification method is expressed under a verification relationship that is acceptable given the proof's purpose."
EDIT: The above suggestion would replace the first "respectively" in the above text. Other text that achieves the same goal in a PR might also be acceptable to resolve this issue.